Assinar

OTT quebra paradigmas, mas ainda não tem modelo claro para marcas e TV segue soberana

Buscar
Meio e Mensagem – Marketing, Mídia e Comunicação

OTT quebra paradigmas, mas ainda não tem modelo claro para marcas e TV segue soberana

Buscar
Star field background image
Publicidade

Blog do Pyr

OTT quebra paradigmas, mas ainda não tem modelo claro para marcas e TV segue soberana

Como tenho insistido, TV não é mais TV, é hoje muito mais. Nem sei como chamar, mas o conteúdo produzido por estúdios e emissoras tem hoje um ampliado espectro de distribuição digital. OTT é o dado novo, mas não está claro como as marcas vão entrar nele. Enquanto isso, tome liderança da TV.


27 de agosto de 2018 - 7h30

Sei que tenho sido chato na tese, mas TV hoje não é mais aquilo que sentamos no sofá para assistir em casa diante de uma tela. É um sem fim de pontos de contato digitais, que o mercado tende a chamar de “vídeo”, mas que sem deixar de ser de fato vídeo, é TV também, só que 2.0. Meio confuso, mas é isso mesmo.

Vamos ter que achar outro nome para tudo isso e o OTT é o dado novo, só que ainda não achou seu modelo comercial. E a TV, seja lá o que for isso hoje, segue soberana.

Abaixo você vê o ecosistema de OTT e mais abaixo o de Pay-TV (dos EUA). É para ilustrar a complexidade desses mundos e mostrar como as infra-estrrturas tecnológicas acabam de tocando aqui e ali, no âmbito da distribuição de conteúdos.

A meu ver, todos esses mundos vão se chocar e convergir para um mega-ecossistema, que será tudo ao mesmo tempo e que nem tem nome ainda.

Star field background image

 

 

 

Aqui o ecossistema de distribuição digital conectado, via streaming. Isso é OTT, mas é TV também. Ou nem?

Abaixo, você pode ler um pouco mais sobre esse tema, em artigo do SVP e especialista do instituto Nielsen, Carl Spaulding.

Carl alerta para coisas parecidas com as que venho alertando, e lembra que enquanto a audiência de OTT cresce e o modelo comercial publicitário dessa nova plataforma ainda engatinha, que as marcas começam a se mexer para ver como ingressar nesse novo universo, que nem métricas de mensuração tem.

OTT é o futuro, mas isso não vai necessariamente querer dizer que ele virá em substituição a TV. Vamos ver.

Enquanto isso, leia o Carl.

 

Commentary

OTT Is More Than Just An Acronym

Carl Spaulding , August 20, 2018

 

For years, the advertising industry talked about how TV is losing ground to digital. 2017 was coined as the year “digital finally beat TV” in ad spend. While that may be true, the eyes are still tuned in to TV.

With the ability to consume content anytime, anywhere, viewing habits have changed. Time spent viewing television content in Q1 2018 topped the previous quarter, per Nielsen, largely due to the rapid increase in video streaming.

There is an entire industry springing up to support new content delivery technologies — particularly OTT (over-the-top). While digital media companies may have stepped out in a big way at Cannes, the undercurrent running outside the festival was all about how the TV ecosystem is changing.

As marketers are continuously challenged to find new ways to grow their brands, ever more quickly, reaching that audience of mostly younger people who don’t subscribe or never subscribed to traditional pay-TV has required creativity. And not only in advertising methods and formats, but also in ad targeting and sales lift measurement.

OTT isn’t a new delivery method for watching TV content — per Nielsen, 67% of TV homes in the U.S. have Internet-enabled devices and the Video Advertising Bureau projected 11% of all U.S. TV households use only OTT streaming services and devices.

This year, OTT became a major channel for video content consumption. As the industry continues to see disruption, it will continue to offer more interesting ways of reaching consumers:  CBS All Access, Amazon Prime’s NFL broadcast, Sling TV and network apps, just to name a few.

More options will lead to better technology, data, targeting and performance.

At this time last year, there was still limited ad-supported inventory and a perception that OTT was relatively expensive. Advertisers were also having difficulty quantifying the value of an audience that watches a show on their laptop or on a mobile device versus a television screen.

But as OTT has reached a critical mass of viewers, advertisers have started to get their toes wet.

We’ve reached an inflection point: Demand has increased enough that supply has started to follow. An entire ecosystem of fresh new faces has popped up, outside of the established leaders (Hulu and Roku), and the conversation has started to change — from “What’s the value?” to “How do we make this happen.”

One of the more interesting use cases is re-targeting, primarily made possible by ACR (automatic content recognition) technology providers, like Gracenote or Inscape (Vizio), to keep track of everything that comes across the glass.

Based on what ad is delivered via a television screen, some brands are choosing to have an ad delivered to a mobile device in the same household on the same day. For example, a yogurt brand might choose to have an ad delivered to a mobile device every time their competitor’s ad was delivered on the television.

Or in a similar vein, have an ad delivered as frequency reinforcement to a mobile device every day that their own ad was delivered via TV.

There are still some pieces to be figured out in the OTT advertising ecosystem, but the good news for advertisers: Tthere is nothing that’s holding you back from reaping the benefits today.

In the near future, OTT will offer the same audience-based buying capabilities that are available for digital advertising today. Till then, OTT is accelerating the use of user-level data in the TV industry, and advertisers have an opportunity to reach this audience with video advertising in creative ways.

Publicidade

Compartilhe

Veja também